﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><ArticleSet><Article><Journal><PublisherName>نسیم خرد</PublisherName><JournalTitle>نسیم خرد</JournalTitle><ISSN> 2476-4302</ISSN><Volume>6</Volume><Issue>1</Issue><PubDate PubStatus="epublish"><Year>2019</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>2</Day></PubDate></Journal><ArticleTitle>Rightness of Philosophical Foundations and Issues Based on the Interpretation of Objectivity of Existence and Quiddity</ArticleTitle><VernacularTitle>صحت مباني و مسائل فلسفي براساس تفسير عينيت وجود و ماهيت</VernacularTitle><FirstPage>37</FirstPage><LastPage>58</LastPage><ELocationID EIdType="doi" /><Language>FA</Language><AuthorList><Author><FirstName>الیاس </FirstName><LastName>عارفی</LastName><Affiliation>دانشگاه باقرالعلوم</Affiliation></Author></AuthorList><History PubStatus="received"><Year>2019</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>2</Day></History><Abstract>After Mulla Sadra dealt especially with the issue of ‘principality of existence and relativity of quiddity’, later expositors attempted to present a right interpretation of this principle. Accordingly, four theories and interpretations were offered, but the selected interpretation, i.e. ‘objectivity of existence and quiddity’ is more precise and more certain than others. According to this interpretation, the reality of ‘thing itself’, for those propositions made of quiddities, is just right with essential possibility. Besides, correspondence of the mental existence with the external existence, definition of quiddity in particular sense as ‘what is said in answer to what is it’, definition of substance and accident as well as the type and division of quiddity into essential and accidental are just well and perfectly meaningful on the basis of this interpretation. </Abstract><OtherAbstract Language="FA">بعد از آنکه صدرالمتألهين به مسئلة «اصالت وجود و اعتباريت ماهيت» به‌طور ويژه پرداخت، شارحانِ پس‌از او بر آن شدند تفسيري صحيح از اين اصل ارائه دهند. بر اين اساس چهار نظريه و تفسير بيان شد که تفسير منتخب، يعني عينيت وجود و ماهيت، در مقايسه با ديگر تفاسير أدقّ و أيقن است. براساس اين تفسير، حقيقي‌بودن «نفس‌الامر» براي قضايايي که از ماهيات ساخته مي‌شوند و ملاک نيازمندي به واجب‌الوجودند، فقط با امکان ماهوي صحيح است. همچنين مطابقت وجود ذهني با وجود خارجي، تعريف ماهيت بالمعني الأخص به «ما يقال في جواب ما هو»، تعريف جوهر و عرض و نوع و تقسيم ماهيت به ذاتي و عرضي فقط براساس اين تفسير به‌طور صحيح و کامل، معنا مي‌پذيرد.</OtherAbstract><ObjectList><Object Type="Keyword"><Param Name="Value">عينيت</Param></Object><Object Type="Keyword"><Param Name="Value">
 وجود</Param></Object><Object Type="Keyword"><Param Name="Value">
 ماهيت</Param></Object><Object Type="Keyword"><Param Name="Value">
 اصالت</Param></Object></ObjectList><ArchiveCopySource DocType="Pdf">http://nasimekherad.ismc.ir/WebUsers/nasimekherad/UploadFiles/OK/13980811113433020121-F.pdf</ArchiveCopySource></Article></ArticleSet>